23XI Racing, owned by Denny Hamlin and Michael Jordan, is entangled in a legal battle against NASCAR, accusing the organization of monopolistic practices. The crux of the issue stems from the new charter agreement proposed by the body, which most teams signed except for 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports. This development has prompted NASCAR analyst Larry McReynolds to admit growing concerns about the outcome of this legal gamble.
“Honestly, at the end of the day, I’m starting to get concerned about the whole Front Row and the 23XI deal. Based on what little I know, based on what I hear and what people explain, it just does not sound like it’s going in their favor,” McReynolds commented on SiriusXM’s On-Track show.
23XI Racing’s lawsuit highlights perceived antitrust violations after the team refused to sign the new charter agreement, which NASCAR introduced for the 2025 season.
The charter system itself, established in 2016, has been controversial, offering teams guaranteed spots in races and apparent financial stability. However, the recent amendment has not been universally well-received. The two teams view the modified terms as restrictive, raising concerns about competition fairness.
Sean Gardner/Getty Images
The legal path for 23XI Racing has been rocky. The team faced initial setbacks when a federal court turned down their request for expedited discovery, and their subsequent appeal for an injunction was similarly denied. Despite these challenges, 23XI Racing has refiled their motion with the US Appeals Court, seeking to contest the charter terms further.
From Larry McReynolds’ perspective, the decision by 23XI and Front Row to pursue legal action reveals a misunderstanding of the broader consensus among NASCAR’s team owners.
“I’m not backing down from my stance on this, and I’m sure if you did a private conversation off the record with the other 13 owners, the ones that signed this agreement, probably most of them, or all of them, would tell you there’s a lot of things that could be better for us as owners in this sport, but as I’ve heard some of them say, it’s not bad,” McReynolds noted.
Opinions within the industry are varied. Richard Childress, reflecting on his decision, noted, “I didn’t have a choice, because we had to sign. I got over 400 employees, OEM contracts, contracts with sponsors, and I’ve gotta take care of my team.”
In contrast, Tony Stewart has been outspoken in his criticism, deriding the charter system as a “joke” and questioning the motives behind the decisions. “When someone like Rick Hendrick says, ‘I just got tired of arguing with them,’ do you think Rick Hendrick runs his business and negotiations and just says, ‘I’m going to just sign this agreement because I’m tired of arguing with you?’ Rick Hendrick’s never done that a day in his life,” Stewart questioned.
As the lawsuit proceeds, the unresolved nature of the case remains a focal point within NASCAR circles. With the US Appeals Court yet to set a date for the motion, the coming months will likely see further developments in the legal fight.
Ultimately, the path forged by 23XI Racing might inspire deeper introspection across NASCAR.
